Bally v. Northeastern University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that all these cases “involved a physical confrontation accompanied by a threat of harm”
• explaining that MCRA claims typically require proof of \a threat of serious harm\ or physical force
• noting that successful cause of action under MCRA requires that “interference or attempted interference was by ‘threats, intimidation or coercion’ ”
• collecting cases involving meritorious MCRA claims and noting that they “each involved a physical confrontation accompanied by a threat of harm’
• no “individualized threat” or “threat of serious harm” alleged and thus no violation of act for school to require random drug testing of athletes
• where private institution and no showing of State action, legal analysis of student athlete drug testing “emphatically differ[s]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).