Broderick v. Roache

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that MCRA claim based on “scheme of harassment” survived summary judgment where plaintiff was subjected to multiple disciplinary hearings, which he ultimately won on appeal
• noting that “[u]ntil and unless Redgrave is more explicitly disavowed, this court must assume that it remains good law”
• denying the City's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' claim against it under the MCRA
• denying the City's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' claim against it under the MCRA
• stating “[t]o violate MCRA there must be, in addition to the deprivation itself, something akin to duress which causes the victim to relinquish her rights”
• finding a reasonable jury could return a verdict for plaintiff where facts included a years-long “scheme of harassment” involving, inter alia, numerous disciplinary proceedings and the alleged deprivation of multiple constitutional and statutory rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).