LaLonde v. Eissner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \common law immunity protects persons appointed by a court to conduct a medical or psychiatric evaluation and render an opinion or to provide other expert assistance\ to the court
• granting summary judgment for defendant where plaintiffs did not dispute any relevant material fact
• observing as adequate the availability of cross-examination, appellate review, and a request for modification
• observing as adequate the availability of cross-examination, appellate review, and a request for modification
• observing as adequate the availability of cross-examination, appellate review, and a request for modification
• “psychologists and other experts would be reluctant to accept court appointments if they thereby opened themselves to liability for their actions in this official capacity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).