Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 4/15/1999

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Citations

429 Mass. 403
708 N.E.2d 669
1999 Mass. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that because the defendant was free to terminate the interview, no seizure occurred when officer approached the defendant on a public street and asked him for his name and address
upholding warrantless visual body cavity search at police station because officer had, at the time he made search, probable cause to believe that defendant had cocaine hidden between his buttocks
upholding warrant-less visual body cavity search at police station because officer had, at the time he made search, probable cause to believe that defendant had cocaine hidden between his buttocks
police did not seize defendant merely by approaching him on public street and asking for his name and address
\[W]e conclude that probable cause is the appropriate standard to apply to strip and visual body cavity searches.\
“motion judge’s findings of fact are binding in the absence of clear error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.