Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When a witness at trial does not remember the earlier ‘inconsistent’ statement, the witness does not ‘distinctly admit making’ the statement under section 90.614(2).” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Faust v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-15· cited 4×
• K.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-13· cited 1×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-03-27

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-23· cited 107×
• Pearce v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-01· cited 83×
• Lamb v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-14· cited 36×
• Perez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-12· cited 33×
• Burton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-08· cited 21×
• State v. Staley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09· cited 13×
• James v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-26· cited 10×
• Pugh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-24· cited 6×
• Adderly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-25· cited 5×
• WENWEI SUN v. Aviles
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-09· cited 4×
• Laur v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 2×
• Houston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-18· cited 1×