James v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that witness’s trial testimony that “he had no recollection” was not truly inconsistent with his previous statement that “he saw [the defendant] murder the victim”
• “ ‘The fact that a witness once stated something was true is not logically inconsistent with a subsequent loss of memory.... Showing the substantive statements that she allegedly made while her memory was fresh does not impeach that testimony.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-23· cited 107×
• State v. Lopez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-08-02· cited 36×
• Senterfitt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-17· cited 5×
• Espinoza v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-09· cited 5×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-21· cited 4×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-13· cited 3×
• Carrada v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-18· cited 2×
• Laur v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 222×
• United States v. Clinton Webster
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-05-09· cited 116×
• Morton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-03-06· cited 66×
• State v. Staley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09· cited 13×
• Calhoun v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-27· cited 6×
• Bowles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-18· cited 4×
• Collins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-12· cited 3×