Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 45 S.W.3d 685
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 1779
  • 2001 WL 253439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in failure to comply with sex offender registration requirements case, that “the jury chose not to believe Appellant’s testimony, which was within its discretion”
  • holding, in failure to comply with sex offender registration requirements case, that “the jury chose not to believe Appellant’s testimony, which was within its discretion”
  • in case involving failure to comply with sex offender registration requirements, “the jury chose not to believe [a]ppellant’s testimony, which was within its discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.