State v. Haskell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[o]ur role in reviewing the constitutionality of a statute must necessarily be limited by the facts in the case before us” (quotation marks omitted)
• collecting cases rejecting challenges to other states' sex offender registration laws on double jeopardy and other grounds, holding that registration requirement was not punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).