Skip to main content

Westbrooks v. State

Citations

  • 145 So. 3d 874
  • 2014 WL 2619430
  • 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he State is not required to rebut a hypothesis of innocence that is unreasonable”
  • “The State is not required to rebut a hypothesis of innocence that is unreasonable.” (citing Henderson v. State, 679 So.2d 805, 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996))
  • “The State is not required to rebut a hypothesis of innocence that is unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Morris, Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.