Skip to main content

Robinson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 583 S.E.2d 60
  • 41 Va. App. 137
  • 2003 Va. App. LEXIS 397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]ndirect or constructive contempt charges . . . are not brought summarily, but must proceed under a more formal procedure than an immediate adjudication by the court”
  • considering an attorney’s failure to alert the court “of his tardiness” in the analysis affirming the sufficiency of the evidence
  • “As the proceeding was not for summary contempt, the trial court was not bound by the constraints of Code § 18.2-456 and acted accordingly.”
  • evidence was sufficient to find the attorney in contempt where he was late and missed his client’s hearing in court due to overscheduling himself in a way that he could not make the hearing
  • finding intent a necessary element of criminal contempt
  • involving nonsummary contempt proceeding for attorney’s failure to appear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.