Skip to main content

Carter v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 345 S.E.2d 5
  • 2 Va. App. 392
  • 1986 Va. App. LEXIS 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the record failed to contain facts sufficient to support the conviction for criminal contempt
  • holding that the record failed to contain facts sufficient to support the conviction for criminal contempt
  • deciding that the rules of evidence apply to a criminal contempt trial and requiring the prosecution to prove contempt beyond a reasonable doubt
  • deciding that the rules of evidence apply to a criminal contempt trial and requiring the prosecution to prove contempt beyond a reasonable doubt
  • deciding that the rules of evidence apply to a criminal contempt trial and requiring the prosecution to prove contempt beyond a reasonable doubt
  • “Criminal contempt occurring in the presence of the court is sometimes referred to as direct contempt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph E. Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.