Skip to main content

Jett v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 510 S.E.2d 747
  • 29 Va. App. 190
  • 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was sufficient evidence of penetration when the victim testified that appellant touched the “outside” of her “pookie” and there was “evidence of the victim’s pain and [of her] swollen clitoris”
  • holding that “[t]he combination of direct and indirect evidence of penetration presented here is distinguishable from the equivocal testimony of the child victim in Moore, which was the sole evidence of penetration in that case”
  • first quoting Horton v. Commonwealth, 255 Va. 606, 612 (1998); and then quoting Morrison v. Commonwealth, 10 Va. App. 300, 301 (1990)
  • “[T]he clitoris lies within the labia majora; therefore, evidence of penetration or stimulation of the clitoris is sufficient to establish penetration of the labia majora . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzpatrick, Benton, Willis, Elder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.