Priscilla Sherrie Parham v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the inherent power of contempt is “as ancient as[] courts themselves” (quoting 12 No. 1661-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 1953-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 0124-25-1 (Assignments of Error 1-2
• recognizing that the inherent power of contempt is “as ancient as[] courts themselves” (quoting 12 No. 1661-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 1953-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 0124-25-1 (Assignments of Error 1-2
• recognizing that the inherent power of contempt is “as ancient as[] courts themselves” (quoting 12 No. 1661-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 1953-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 0124-25-1 (Assignments of Error 1-2
• recognizing that the inherent power of contempt is “as ancient as[] courts themselves” (quoting 12 No. 1661-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 1953-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 0124-25-1 (Assignments of Error 1-2
• recognizing that the inherent power of contempt is “as ancient as[] courts themselves” (quoting 12 No. 1661-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 1953-24-1 (Assignments of Error 1-3); No. 0124-25-1 (Assignments of Error 1-2
• explaining that the “power to punish for contempt is inherent in, and as ancient as, courts themselves” (quoting Carter v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 392, 395 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).