Canipe v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a killing was done in the heat of passion upon reasonable provocation is a question of fact
• holding that the defendant’s decision to keep driving after hitting the victim supported the conclusion that he had hit the victim deliberately
• finding malice even though the victim approached the front of the defendant’s vehicle on his own accord
• relying in part on evidence that accused falsely reported details of offense to police in effort to portray victim as aggressor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).