Skip to main content

Roberts v. State

Citations

  • 469 A.2d 442
  • 298 Md. 261
  • 1983 Md. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing prior to the admission of a so-called “dog lineup,” the circuit judge initially concluded that the tracking canine, “Sniffer,” had demonstrated reliability in tracking and that his handler was qualified to interpret the dog’s actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.