Skip to main content

Winston v. State

Citations

  • 78 S.W.3d 522
  • 2002 WL 480114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony from Deputy Pikett describing dog’s alert in scent lineup admissible
  • concluding that the use of dog-scent lineups is a “legitimate field of expertise”
  • holding that testimony from Deputy Pikett describing dog's alert in scent lineup admissible
  • analyzing third prong of Nenno utilizing three-factor approach to determine admissibility of human-scent lineup evidence in burglary case
  • involving approval of Deputy Pikett’s method for scent-pad lineup by the National Police Bloodhound Association manual
  • involving some peer review via approval of techniques by other experts and evidence of dogs’ success in identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leslie Brock Yates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.