Markey v. Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court’s denial of a continuance is not a ground for reversal absent an abuse of discretion
• explaining that Maryland, as well as other states, have rejected the rule of strict construction in favor of a “reasonableness rule” that focuses on the intent of the parties
• “Denial of a motion for continuance, absent an abuse of discretion, is not a ground for reversal.”
• denial of continuance not reversed unless abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).