Robert Stewart v. Donald Donges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the defendant's interlocutory appeal . .. based on qualified immunity divested the district court of jurisdiction to conduct atrial\
• holding law was clearly established in December of 1985 that the victim's alleged recantation of his accusation was highly material to a finding of probable cause
• holding law was clearly established in December of 1985 that the victim’s alleged recantation of his accusation was highly material to a finding of probable cause
• stating that interlocutory appeal “divests the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with any part of the action against an appealing defendant.”
• stating that, during the pendency of an interlocutory appeal, the district court retains jurisdiction over “peripheral matters unrelated to the disputed right”
• noting that law from seven sister circuits sufficiently put the defendant on notice of a clearly established right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).