Tenth Circuit· 6/13/2008
Wilkins v. DeReyes
Citations
- 528 F.3d 790
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12676
- 2008 WL 2391244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff’s assertion that officers intentionally coerced false statements supported a § 1983 claim
- ruling that where detention occurs after legal process, a plaintiff, can challenge whether the legal process itself was wrongful and state a “Fourth Amendment violation sufficient to support a § 1983 malicious prosecution cause of action”
- explaining that the court must set aside false information when determining if there is probable cause
- explaining that “the issuance of an arrest warrant represents a classic example of the institution of legal process”
- concluding there was absence of probable cause when excluding allegedly false coerced statements from warrant because that was only evidence implicating plaintiffs in murders
- stating that in such a circumstance a dismissal may be indicative of innocence and thereby constitute a favor able termination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, McKay, Tymkovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Manuel v. City of JolietSupreme Court· 2017-03-21· cited 1,069×
- Bryson v. GonzalesTenth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 909×
- Sykes v. AndersonSixth Circuit· 2010-11-09· cited 670×
- Susan King v. Todd HarwoodSixth Circuit· 2017-03-27· cited 249×
- Riggins v. GoodmanTenth Circuit· 2009-07-10· cited 222×
- Stonecipher v. VallesTenth Circuit· 2014-07-01· cited 176×
- PJ Ex Rel. Jensen v. WagnerTenth Circuit· 2010-05-05· cited 128×
- Myers v. KoopmanTenth Circuit· 2013-12-20· cited 127×
- Young v. DavisTenth Circuit· 2009-02-03· cited 119×
- McCarty v. GilchristTenth Circuit· 2011-07-14· cited 118×
- William Avery v. City of MilwaukeeSeventh Circuit· 2017-01-30· cited 116×
- Bledsoe v. Board Cty Comm. Jefferson KSTenth Circuit· 2022-11-15· cited 116×
- Margheim v. BuljkoTenth Circuit· 2017-04-28· cited 100×
- Smith v. Veterans AdministrationTenth Circuit· 2011-03-01· cited 94×
- Harrington v. City of NashuaFirst Circuit· 2010-06-29· cited 90×
- Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2016-03-08· cited 84×
- Puller v. BacaTenth Circuit· 2015-03-20· cited 82×
- Montoya v. VigilTenth Circuit· 2018-08-07· cited 76×
- Sanchez v. HartleyTenth Circuit· 2016-01-11· cited 71×
- Poolaw v. MarcantelTenth Circuit· 2009-05-04· cited 65×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 7,028×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 4,908×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,857×
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court· 1996-02-21· cited 2,084×
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court· 1971-03-29· cited 1,845×
- Cortez v. McCauleyTenth Circuit· 2007-02-19· cited 554×
- Medina v. CramTenth Circuit· 2001-06-12· cited 519×
- Foote v. SpiegelTenth Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 513×
- Murphy v. LynnSecond Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 412×
- Pierce v. GilchristTenth Circuit· 2004-03-02· cited 358×
- Becker v. KrollTenth Circuit· 2007-07-19· cited 288×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.