Skip to main content
· 12/31/1990

Camille Deloach v. Mitzi Bevers

Citations

  • 922 F.2d 618
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22451
  • 1990 WL 226592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim for retaliatory arrest could be made even if probable cause existed for the arrest
  • concluding evidence existed from which a jury could conclude detective made “reckless misstatements” in affidavit where evidence contradicted the statements and other evidence demonstrated affidavit statements were “exaggeration[s]”
  • affirming jury verdict in favor of plaintiff when evidence established that police officer deliberately failed to disclose exculpatory opinion of a key medical expert
  • discussing liability for probable cause affidavit that failed to include “information garnered from a number of witnesses which tended to contradict the officer’s allegations” (in ternal quotation marks omitted; alterations incorporated)
  • “Recklessness may be inferred from omission of facts which are ‘clearly critical’ to a finding of probable cause.”
  • “Recklessness may be inferred from omission of facts which are ‘clearly critical’ to a finding of probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Logan, Brorby, Bratton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.