United States v. Louis John Ippolito, Michael Contino, Irving Schwartz, William Darnold, Lawrence Miller, Thomas Arrants, and Arthur Joseph Natoli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while the Franks decision addressed probable cause, its reasoning now applies to the necessity determination because of “the importance of truthful information to the neutral detached magistrate who must . . . decide whether to issue a wiretap order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).