Robert Hoskins v. Connie Lenear

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prisoner not entitled to process for discipline of two months segregation, loss of prison job, loss of privileges, and transfer
• holding that the punishments the plaintiff suffered because of his disciplinary conviction—demotion in status, segregation and transfer— raise no due process concerns
• holding that “the punishments [inmate] suffered because of his disciplinary conviction (demotion in status, segregation, and transfer) raise no due process concerns.”
• concluding that a prisoner was not entitled to due process for discipline of two months in segregation, the loss of prison job, the loss of privileges, and a transfer
• determining that a prisoner was not entitled to due process protections where he got two months of segregation and was transferred to another prison
• determining that a prisoner was not entitled to process for discipline of two months in segregation, the loss of prison job, the loss of privileges, and a transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).