William K. Zimmerman v. Margarita Tribble, Craig Hanks and Edward L. Cohn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “deprivation of the opportunity to earn good time credits . . . is not a constitutional violation”
• concluding that “sporadic and short-term delays” in receiving mail were “insufficient to state a cause of action grounded upon the First Amendment”
• holding that a “deprivation of the opportunity to earn good time credits . . . is not a constitutional violation”
• holding that a “deprivation of the opportunity to earn good time credits . . . is not a constitutional violation”
• concluding that an alleged delay in delivering mail on one occasion failed to state First Amendment claim
• holding that a “deprivation of the opportunity to earn good time credits . . . is not a constitutional violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).