Skip to main content

Roberson v. State

Citations

  • 852 S.W.2d 508
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48
  • 1993 WL 44427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that special instruction on mistaken identity would constitute improper comment on weight of evidence
  • holding that without a showing the pre-trial motion had merit, and that a ruling on the motion would have changed outcome of case, counsel will not be ineffective for failing to assert motion
  • holding that without a showing that a pretrial motion had merit and that a ruling on the motion would have changed the outcome of the case, counsel is not ineffective for failing to assert the motion
  • holding that without a showing that a pretrial motion had merit and that a ruling on the motion would have changed the outcome of the case, counsel is not ineffective for failing to assert the motion
  • holding that without a showing that a pretrial motion had merit and that a ruling on the motion would have changed the outcome of the case, counsel is not ineffective for failing to assert the motion
  • holding that without a showing that a pretrial motion had merit and that a ruling on the motion would have changed the outcome of the case, counsel is not ineffective for failing to assert the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.