Laws v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the prosecutor is entitled to present evidence that tends to refute the defensive theory of the accused and the evidence introduced in support of it
• recognizing that the prosecutor is entitled to present evidence that tends to refute the defensive theory of the accused and the evidence introduced in support of it
• determining that instructions on mistaken identity would constitute improper comments on the weight of the evidence
• overruling complaint that the State’s rebuttal evidence did not relate to defensive theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).