Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 973 S.W.2d 954
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 87
  • 1998 WL 375422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance could not be sustained based on the record before the appellate court because appellant failed to develop facts and details of the search sufficient to show that the search was invalid
  • explaining that in the majority of cases, the record on direct appeal is simply undeveloped and cannot adequately reflect the alleged failings of trial counsel
  • providing that, in order to be entitled to relief, a defendant is obligated to show that his suppression motion would have been granted
  • explaining that involuntary guilty plea claim requires affirmative support in record
  • rejecting ineffective-assistance claim because appellant failed to carry his burden to develop enough of the details of the search to show its invalidity
  • appellant must prove that motion to suppress would have been granted to establish that he was deprived of counsel by counsel's failure to file motion to suppress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Overstreet, Baird, State

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

905 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.