Skip to main content

Vasquez v. State

Citations

  • 830 S.W.2d 948
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8
  • 1992 WL 4042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel when trial counsel did not request jury charge on necessity defense
  • concluding that record sufficiently raised defense of necessity and that trial counsel had no possible reason for not requesting instruction on necessity defense
  • holding that failure to request instruction when trial court would have erred in refusing instruction constituted deficient performance under Strickland
  • concluding that trial counsel’s failure to request an instruction on necessity was ineffective assistance where the defendant “had nothing to lose by requesting a defensive instruction”
  • holding that testimony by defendant clearly indicated he had acted out of a perceived necessity and therefore it was unacceptable trial tactic to fail to request an instruction on necessity
  • observing that the defendant admitted to the conduct and that his testimony raised the necessity defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, McCormick, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

312 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.