Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/17/2002

Roark v. Humana, Inc.

Citations

  • 307 F.3d 298
  • 2002 WL 31084216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim that an HMO had failed to use ordinary care in making a medical necessity determination sounded in tort and was not preempted
  • stating that the Supreme Court has not decided whether section 502(a)(1)(B) preempts a medical malpractice claim involving “mixed decisions,” but holding under Fifth Circuit law that it does not
  • “ERISA provides no cause of action for medical malpractice claims against an HMO” and such claims are therefore not preempted by § 502(a)(1)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, Parker, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Roark v. Humana, Inc.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.