Ninth Circuit· 12/12/1985
Rizzo v. Dawson
Citations
- 778 F.2d 527
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25415
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- successful retaliation claim must allege retaliation and that prison officials’ actions either did not advance legitimate correctional goals or were not narrowly tailored to meet those goals
- intrastate prison transfer does not implicate Due Process 5 Clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterNinth Circuit· 2012-02-13· cited 2,138×
- Silva v. Di VittorioNinth Circuit· 2011-09-26· cited 504×
- Clarence Jones v. Max WilliamsNinth Circuit· 2015-06-26· cited 422×
- Schroeder v. McDonaldNinth Circuit· 1995-05-19· cited 359×
- Hines v. GomezNinth Circuit· 1997-03-07· cited 317×
- Bruce v. YlstNinth Circuit· 2003-12-10· cited 230×
- Hydrick v. McDanielNinth Circuit· 2007-08-30· cited 145×
- Lamont Shepard v. T. QuillenNinth Circuit· 2016-10-26· cited 92×
- Tighe v. WallFifth Circuit· 1996-11-27· cited 85×
- Vance v. BarrettNinth Circuit· 2003-09-30· cited 82×
- Mike Hernandez v. George F. DentonNinth Circuit· 1988-11-23· cited 67×
- Vignolo v. MillerNinth Circuit· 1997-07-31· cited 62×
- Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonNinth Circuit· 2021-09-08· cited 53×
- Miller v. CampbellW.D. Tennessee· 2000-06-27· cited 45×
- National Association of Radiation Survivors v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of the Department of Veterans AffairsNinth Circuit· 1993-06-18· cited 38×
- Hydrick v. HunterNinth Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 38×
- Phillips v. OrnoskiNinth Circuit· 2012-03-16· cited 35×
- Wilkins v. RamirezS.D. California· 2006-10-02· cited 22×
- Torricellas v. PooleC.D. California· 1997-02-04· cited 18×
- Canell v. Multnomah CountyD. Oregon· 2001-02-26· cited 17×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,238×
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 3,080×
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court· 1983-04-26· cited 3,076×
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppNinth Circuit· 1984-10-23· cited 3,076×
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court· 1974-04-29· cited 2,649×
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court· 1974-06-24· cited 2,527×
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,564×
- Hoptowit v. RayNinth Circuit· 1982-02-16· cited 1,224×
- Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. HydeNinth Circuit· 1980-07-01· cited 753×
- Larry A. Storseth, 623435 v. John D. SpellmanNinth Circuit· 1981-08-31· cited 718×
- United Transportation Union v. State Bar of MichiganSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 206×
- Owens v. RushTenth Circuit· 1981-06-29· cited 112×
- Leonard D. Goodisman v. Scott LytleNinth Circuit· 1984-01-24· cited 83×
- Brian W. Stanger v. City of Santa CruzNinth Circuit· 1980-03-24· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.