Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt Cupp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even “[a] paid complaint that is ‘obviously frivolous’ does not confer 23 subject matter jurisdiction ....”
• ‘[C]ourt permission to proceed IFP is 12 ||itself a matter of privilege and not right.”
• “[C]ourt permission to proceed IFP is 6 itself a matter of privilege and not right.”’
• “paid complaint that is 24 ‘obviously frivolous’ does not confer federal subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).