Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 2/16/1982

Hoptowit v. Ray

Citations

  • 682 F.2d 1237
  • 9 Fed. R. Serv. 1511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district courts have broad discretion in appointing amicus curiae
  • holding prisoners do not have a right to a job
  • holding deliberate indifference “appl[ies] to physical, dental, and mental health”
  • “The Eighth Amendment requires that prison officials provide a system of ready access to adequate medical care.”
  • totality of conditions may not justify relief which must be based on showing of independent constitutional violation
  • “The Eighth 2 Amendment standards for conditions in isolation, segregation, and protective custody cells 3 are no different from standards applying to the general population.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tang, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

282 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hoptowit v. Ray

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.