Canell v. Multnomah County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no serious medical need where plaintiff complained he needed reading glasses and had headaches without them
• “While severe eye injuries or legal blindness may constitute a serious medical need, that is not the case with reading glasses.”
• “While severe eye injuries or legal blindness may constitute a serious medical need, that is not the case with reading glasses.”
• “While severe eye injuries or legal blindness may constitute a serious medical need, that is not the case with reading glasses.”
• “While severe eye injuries or legal blindness may constitute a serious medical need, that is not the case with reading glasses.”
• a plaintiff “cannot state 25 a First Amendment claim based on alleged retaliation for filing a grievance when the 26 underlying grievance is frivolous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).