Seventh Circuit· 5/7/1993
Ritter v. Ross
Citations
- 992 F.2d 750
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10506
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that state court foreclosure judgment was subject of federal lawsuit, and, therefore, Rooker-Feldman applied
- finding that federal plaintiffs objections to state court foreclosure judgment was subject of federal lawsuit, and, therefore, Rooker-Feldman applied
- finding that plaintiffs’ complaint was barred by Rooker-Feldman even though it alleged that they did not receive notice of the foreclosure action
- explaining that plaintiffs cannot avoid Rooker‐Feldman by framing challenges to state judgments as civil‐rights actions
- challenging the “notice of the pendency of the foreclosure action and of their opportunity to object”
- discussing the distinction made by the Feldman court when it held that the federal courts may review the constitutionality of state bar rules as such rules are more legislative in function
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyNinth Circuit· 2000-02-03· cited 422×
- Bianchi v. RylaarsdamNinth Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 340×
- Stephen Moccio v. New York State Office of Court AdministrationSecond Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 221×
- Kenman Engineering v. City of UnionTenth Circuit· 2002-12-17· cited 110×
- Ingalls v. Erlewine (In Re Erlewine)Fifth Circuit· 2003-11-19· cited 69×
- Harold O. Postma v. First Fed. SavingsEighth Circuit· 1996-01-19· cited 66×
- Michelle Gilbank v. Wood County Department of Human ServicesSeventh Circuit· 2024-08-01· cited 50×
- Harris v. New York State Department of HealthS.D. New York· 2002-04-24· cited 48×
- O'Malley, Robert C. v. Litscher, Jon E.Seventh Circuit· 2006-10-16· cited 34×
- Hart v. Comerica BankE.D. Michigan· 1997-02-24· cited 18×
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-30· cited 17×
- Jeffrey Cogan v. Arnaldo TrabuccoNinth Circuit· 2024-08-21· cited 11×
- Reisinger v. Luzerne CountyM.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-02-02· cited 8×
- Snodderly v. KansasD. Kansas· 1999-11-19· cited 7×
- Fontana Empire Center, LLC v. City of FontanaNinth Circuit· 2002-10-03· cited 7×
- Nationscredit Home Equity Services Corp. v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2001-03-22· cited 5×
- Brooks-Jones v. HonesS.D. New York· 1996-02-08· cited 3×
- Scariano v. JUSTICES OF S. CT. OF STATE OF IND.S.D. Indiana· 1994-03-25· cited 3×
- Peterson v. FoxD. New Hampshire· 2007-05-17· cited 3×
- Coregis Insurance v. City of HamtramckE.D. Michigan· 1998-07-14· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 7,192×
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 1,834×
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 702×
- Ritter v. RossSeventh Circuit· 1993-05-07· cited 167×
- Lee Thomas Lynk v. Laporte Superior Court No. 2, Hon. Don E. Harner, and Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1986-04-24· cited 99×
- Linda A. Leaf and Andrew B. Haynes v. Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin, Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility, Gerald SternbergSeventh Circuit· 1992-11-12· cited 94×
- John M. Hagerty v. Succession of Laura McCloskey ClementFifth Circuit· 1984-12-17· cited 80×
- Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus v. Goldberg and Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., and Peg GoldbergSeventh Circuit· 1990-11-21· cited 63×
- Razatos v. Colorado Supreme CourtTenth Circuit· 1984-10-29· cited 49×
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MoranSeventh Circuit· 1992-03-24· cited 18×
- Guess v. Board of Medical ExaminersFourth Circuit· 1992-06-25· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.