Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 5/7/1993

Ritter v. Ross

Citations

  • 992 F.2d 750
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that state court foreclosure judgment was subject of federal lawsuit, and, therefore, Rooker-Feldman applied
  • finding that federal plaintiffs objections to state court foreclosure judgment was subject of federal lawsuit, and, therefore, Rooker-Feldman applied
  • finding that plaintiffs’ complaint was barred by Rooker-Feldman even though it alleged that they did not receive notice of the foreclosure action
  • explaining that plaintiffs cannot avoid Rooker‐Feldman by framing challenges to state judgments as civil‐rights actions
  • challenging the “notice of the pendency of the foreclosure action and of their opportunity to object”
  • discussing the distinction made by the Feldman court when it held that the federal courts may review the constitutionality of state bar rules as such rules are more legislative in function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.