Skip to main content
· 1/19/1996

Harold O. Postma v. First Fed. Savings

Citations

  • 74 F.3d 160
  • 1996 WL 16898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiffs cannot seek reversal of a state-court judgment simply by casting their complaint in the form of a procedural due process violation
  • holding Rooker–Feldman bars federal consideration even when the plaintiff argues his procedural due process rights were violated by lack of notice in the state court action
  • holding Rooker-Feldman bars federal consideration even when the plaintiff argues his procedural due process rights were violated by lack of notice in the state court action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Memillian, Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.