O'Malley, Robert C. v. Litscher, Jon E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Rooker-Feldman did not bar an inmate’s Eighth Amendment claims against prison officers for their execution of a state court’s force-feed order
• finding it was not unreasonable to deny the use of a bathroom because the defendants “did not simply ignore his need to urinate” but instead “offered him a urine bottle, and ultimately . . . relieved him through use of a catheter”
• Rooker-Feldman did not bar an inmate’s Eighth Amendment claims against prison medical officials relating to their execution of a state court's force-feed order
• 90-minute delay caused by shift change was not deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).