Supreme Court· 5/30/1989

Asarco Inc. v. Kadish

Citations

490 U.S. 605
109 S. Ct. 2037
104 L. Ed. 2d 696
1989 U.S. LEXIS 2652
57 U.S.L.W. 4574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the federal issues had been adjudicated by the state court and that the remaining issues would not give rise to any further federal question
holding that the federal issues had been adjudicated by the state court and that the remaining issues would not give rise to any further federal question
recognizing that constraints in Article III of U.S. Constitution do not apply to state 6 courts and therefore state courts are not bound by federal case-or-controversy or justiciability rules
recognizing that state courts “render binding judicial decisions that rest on their own interpretations of federal law”
holding that state courts may render decisions based on their own interpretations of federal law unless the statute provides for exclusive federal jurisdiction
holding that it was the ―right‖ of Arizona state courts to take ―no account of federal standing rules‖ in state court, even on a matter interpreting federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Members, Ii-A, Ii-B-, Ii-C, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, Rehnquist, Scalia, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

450 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Asarco Inc. v. Kadish

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.