Ninth Circuit· 6/27/2003

Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam

Citations

334 F.3d 895
2003 WL 21480364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a due process claim 11 against a state court judge for bias was “inextricably intertwined” with the state court’s decision, 12 and thus beyond the federal court’s subject matter jurisdiction
holding that 11 plaintiff’s due process claim was barred under Rooker-Feldman, regardless of 12 whether the state court had adjudicated it, because it effectively asked the Ninth 13 Circuit to “undo” the state court’s decision
holding Rooker-Feldman precludes adjudication where “the only redress [plaintiffs] seek is an ‘undoing’ of the prior state- court judgment”
explaining that Rooker- Feldman precludes adjudication of claims when the redress sought by the plaintiff is an “undoing” of the prior state court judgment
explaining that Rooker- Feldman precludes adjudication of claims when the redress sought by the plaintiff is an “undoing” of the prior state court judgment
explaining that Rooker-Feldman precludes adjudication of claims when the redress sought by the plaintiff is an “undoing” of the prior state court judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, McKeown, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.