Nevada Supreme Court· 7/7/1994
Riley v. State
Citations
- 878 P.2d 272
- 110 Nev. 638
- 1994 Nev. LEXIS 94
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that counsel's failure to object to prosecutorial misconduct may constitute deficient performance
- explaining that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to have the defendant psychologically evaluated despite indications that the defendant had previously been hospitalized and had abused drugs
- explaining that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to have the defendant psychologically evaluated despite indications that the defendant had previously been hospitalized and had abused drugs
- explaining that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to have the defendant psychologically evaluated despite indications that the defendant had previously been hospitalized and had abused drugs
- noting petitioner bears the burden of establishing prejudice as a result of counsel's failure to object or argue issues of prosecutorial misconduct on appeal
- giving deference to district court's findings related to ineffective-assistance claim, including credibility determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lader v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional CenterNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-06· cited 362×
- Nika v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-12-31· cited 149×
- Ennis v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-13· cited 118×
- State v. NicksSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 99×
- United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1998-12-16· cited 84×
- Sullivan v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 51×
- Palmer v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 30×
- Little v. WardenNevada Supreme Court· 2001-11-15· cited 27×
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 23×
- Hernandez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-10-30· cited 21×
- Hill v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 18×
- Barnhart v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-03-16· cited 11×
- Moore v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-05-17· cited 6×
- Dumas v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1995-10-04· cited 3×
- CHAPPELL (JAMES) v. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-PC)Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-12-30· cited 2×
- MOORE (RANDOLPH) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-PC)Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-05-17
- GONZALEZ (ERNESTO) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2015-12-31
- STATE VS. SMITH (TERRANCE)Nevada Supreme Court· 2015-09-03
- Regala (Joseph) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2019-11-15
- Marquez (Johnny) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-01-23
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- Warden, Nevada State Prison v. LyonsNevada Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 307×
- United States v. Laurel Joan MorrisFifth Circuit· 1978-02-24· cited 183×
- United States v. David GarzaFifth Circuit· 1979-12-21· cited 181×
- Larry Eugene Evans v. Samuel Lewis Lloyd BramlettNinth Circuit· 1988-08-22· cited 116×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert MURRAY, James Moore, and Susan Watson, Defendants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1985-01-22· cited 74×
- Riley v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1991-03-28· cited 45×
- Deutscher v. WhitleyNinth Circuit· 1991-10-15· cited 43×
- Deutscher v. AngeloneNinth Circuit· 1994-02-16· cited 31×
- State v. LoveNevada Supreme Court· 1993-12-22· cited 15×
- Ramirez-Garza v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 6×
- Schrader v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 5×
- Riley v. Nevada Supreme CourtD. Nevada· 1991-02-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.