Nevada Supreme Court· 3/5/1986
Schrader v. State
Citations
- 714 P.2d 1008
- 102 Nev. 64
- 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing a criminal conviction based on a prosecutor's persistence in repeating an improper remark regarding facts not in evidence
- reversing a criminal conviction based on a prosecutor's persistence in repeating an improper remark regarding facts not in evidence
- reference to information or conversations which occurred outside of the courtroom is improper during closing argument
- prosecutor repeatedly “testified” as to witnesses’ credibility
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.