Skip to main content

Schrader v. State

Citations

  • 714 P.2d 1008
  • 102 Nev. 64
  • 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing a criminal conviction based on a prosecutor's persistence in repeating an improper remark regarding facts not in evidence
  • reversing a criminal conviction based on a prosecutor's persistence in repeating an improper remark regarding facts not in evidence
  • reference to information or conversations which occurred outside of the courtroom is improper during closing argument
  • prosecutor repeatedly “testified” as to witnesses’ credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.