Skip to main content

Sullivan v. State

Citations

  • 96 P.3d 761
  • 120 Nev. 537
  • 120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 61
  • 2004 Nev. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an amended judgment of conviction would provide good cause to challenge any amendments to the judgment
  • recognizing that an amendment to a judgment of conviction may provide good cause to present claims challenging the amendment in an untimely postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus
  • explaining that the time provisions discussed in NRS Chapter 34 do not automatically restart simply because an amended judgment of conviction is entered
  • explaining that the time provisions discussed in NRS Chapter 34 do not automatically restart simply because an amended judgment of conviction is entered
  • explaining that the time provisions discussed in NRS Chapter 34 do not automatically restart simply because an amended judgment of conviction is entered
  • explaining that the time provisions discussed in NRS Chapter 34 do not automatically restart simply because an amended judgment of conviction is entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Rose, Maupin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.