Little v. Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district coures failure to inform the defendant of his ineligibility for parole is harmless error where the totality of the circumstances demonstrate that the defendant knew of his ineligibility
• disagreeing that court has duty to advise on grounds that “parole is a collateral consequence not within the purview of the . . . court’s sentencing discretion”
• measuring the period as \five years after the remittitur disposing of the direct appeal or the judgment of conviction where no direct appeal was filed\
• measuring the period as \five years after the remittitur disposing of the direct appeal or the judgment of conviction where no direct appeal was filed\
• giving deference to factual findings made by the district court in the course of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea
• giving deference to factual findings made by the district court in the course of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).