Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 789 So. 2d 1114
  • 2001 WL 692352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding habeas corpus claim of resentencing in absentia was not cognizable either as a rule 3.800(a) or a rule 3.850 motion, though a new sentencing hearing might have been required if direct review of the sentencing order had been sought

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.