Leichtman v. Singletary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court from one county does not have jurisdiction to hear a petition collaterally attacking a judgment and sentence from another county.
• holding that a court from one county does not have jurisdiction to hear a petition collaterally attacking a judgment and sentence from another county
• recognizing that although rule 3.850 \completely superseded habeas corpus as the means of collateral attack of a judgment and sentence\ habeas remains available to test pretrial detention
• holding that a court from one county does not have jurisdiction to hear a petition collaterally attacking a judgment and sentence from another county.
• holding that the failure to exhaust post-conviction remedies, when it appears that such remedy would be adequate, precludes habeas relief
• holding that the only court that has jurisdiction to hear a challenge as to the legality of a conviction or sentence is the court where he was convicted and sentenced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).