Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/20/2012
Richardson v. Boozer
Citations
- 209 Md. App. 1
- 57 A.3d 1028
- 2012 Md. App. LEXIS 152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A question regarding statutory interpretation is a legal question, which we review de novo.”
- “A question regarding statutory interpretation is a legal question, which we review de novo.”
- “A question regarding statutory interpretation is a legal question, which we review de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hotten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-26· cited 257×
- In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 139×
- In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-10· cited 138×
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-15· cited 132×
- Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-14· cited 120×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-12-19· cited 93×
- Reier v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-05· cited 61×
- Voishan v. PalmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-22· cited 61×
- Allstate Insurance v. Kyong Ho KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-07-31· cited 60×
- McCarthy v. Bd. of Education of AA Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-07· cited 47×
- Cosby v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-25· cited 41×
- Schreyer v. ChaplainCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-06· cited 39×
- Gomez v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-22· cited 34×
- Beeler v. BeelerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-11-19· cited 30×
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-22· cited 30×
- In the Interest of FrostTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1991-09-05· cited 29×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-21· cited 28×
- Rossville Vending MacHine Corp. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-09-01· cited 22×
- Mohan v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-04· cited 21×
- Chimes v. MichaelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-30· cited 20×
Other cases named Richardson v. Boozer
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.