Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/21/2010

Elliott v. State

Citations

10 A.3d 761
417 Md. 413
2010 Md. LEXIS 767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that probable cause existed based on the smell of marijuana when officers approached a car
recognizing that prejudice results “when the State’s failure to raise an issue prevents the defendant from rebutting a claim or adducing evidence necessary to form defenses”
fundamental fairness required disclosure of State’s confidential informant because it was necessary for the defense to prepare
“‘[W]here the record in a case adequately demonstrates that the decision of the trial court was correct, although on a ground not relied upon by the trial court and perhaps not even raised by the parties, an appellate court will affirm.’”
“ ‘[W]here the record in a case adequately demonstrates that the decision of the trial court was correct, although on a ground not relied upon by the trial court and perhaps not even raised by the parties, an appellate court will affirm.’ ”
“Where the record in a case adequately demonstrates that the decision of the trial court was correct, although on a ground not relied upon by the trial court and perhaps not even raised by the parties, an appellate court will affirm.” (quoting Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 502 (1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.