Skip to main content
· 4/25/2012

Cosby v. Department of Human Resources

Citations

  • 42 A.3d 596
  • 425 Md. 629
  • 2012 WL 1414832
  • 2012 Md. LEXIS 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering whether adjudication of neglect precludes the same issue in subsequent administrative child neglect reporting process
  • “[s]tatutes in derogation of the common law are strictly construed” (internal quotations and citation omitted) (alteration in original)
  • \it is not to be presumed that the [L]egislature ... intended to make any alteration in the common law other than what has been specified and plainly pronounced\
  • “When an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties, 19 whether on the same or a different claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Harrell, Greene, Adkins, Barbera, Wilner, Alan, Cathell, Dale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.