Ninth Circuit· 4/25/2005

Rhodes v. Robinson

Citations

408 F.3d 559
2005 WL 937814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that to state a First Amendment retaliation claim, a prisoner must allege protected conduct and retaliation “because of” that conduct
holding that a First Amendment 2 20-55879 retaliation claim in the prison context requires a plausible allegation that adverse actions were taken because of protected conduct
holding that a first amendment retaliation claim requires “[a]n assertion that a state actor took some adverse action against an inmate” and that the adverse action was “because of” protected conduct
holding that first element was met when prison 2 guards “arbitrarily confiscated, withheld, and eventually destroyed [plaintiff’s] property, 3 threatened to transfer him to another correctional institution, and ultimately assaulted 4 him”
recognizing that state prisoners have the First Amendment right to file prison grievances
holding that a prisoner stated a retaliation claim 28 with allegations that officials “(1) arbitrarily confiscated, withheld, and eventually destroyed his 1 property, threatened to transfer him to another correctional institution, and ultimately assaulted 2 him, (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rhodes v. Robinson

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.