Richard Blaisdell v. C. Frappiea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts have an “obligation to give a liberal construction 28 to the filings of pro se litigants”
• holding that courts have an “obligation to give a liberal construction 28 to the filings of pro se litigants”
• “This rule relieves pro se litigants from the strict application of procedural rules and demands that a court not hold missing or inaccurate legal terminology or muddled draftsmanship against them.” (emphasis added)
• courts liberally construe 2 ||pro se litigants’ filings, relieving them from “strict application of procedural rules and 3 ||demands ....”
• the rule of liberal construction “relieves pro se 8 litigants from the strict application of procedural rules”
• courts liberally construe pro se litigants’ 27 || filings, relieving them from strict application of procedural rules and demands

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).