Ninth Circuit· 9/8/2010
Rhodes v. Robinson
Citations
- 621 F.3d 1002
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18748
- 2010 WL 3489777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, “when a plaintiff 7 files an amended complaint, ‘[t]he amended complaint super[s]edes the original, the latter 8 being treated thereafter as non-existent’”
- finding that the 26 amended complaint “supercedes the original” and the original complaint is “treated thereafter as non-existent”
- stating that as a general rule an amended complaint supersedes “the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent”
- explaining that “[a]s a general rule, when a plaintiff files an amended complaint, ‘[t]he amended complaint super[s]edes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent’”
- explaining that when a plaintiff files an amended complaint, it supersedes the original, and nothing in the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement creates an exception to this rule
- noting that “[a]s a general rule, when a plaintiff files an amended 4 complaint, ‘the amended complaint super[s]edes the original, the latter being 5 treated thereafter as non-existent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Tashima, Bea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaNinth Circuit· 2012-11-05· cited 1,319×
- Todd Mattox v. Adam EdelmanSixth Circuit· 2017-03-15· cited 292×
- Erineo Cano v. Nicole TaylorNinth Circuit· 2014-01-14· cited 211×
- Ramirez v. CollierSupreme Court· 2022-03-24· cited 161×
- May v. SegoviaTenth Circuit· 2019-07-12· cited 152×
- Charlie Jackson v. R. FongNinth Circuit· 2017-08-31· cited 112×
- Shikeb Saddozai v. Ron DavisNinth Circuit· 2022-05-23· cited 88×
- We are America/Somos America v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsD. Arizona· 2011-08-18· cited 10×
- Martinez v. Guadalupe CountyD. New Mexico· 2016-07-29· cited 5×
- Washington v. GraceThird Circuit· 2011-09-26· cited 2×
- Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2016-01-04
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 10,443×
- Rhodes v. RobinsonNinth Circuit· 2005-04-25· cited 1,970×
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenNinth Circuit· 1967-03-06· cited 1,382×
- Wyatt v. TerhuneNinth Circuit· 2003-01-02· cited 1,133×
- Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court· 1964-05-25· cited 741×
- McKinney v. CareyNinth Circuit· 2002-12-05· cited 641×
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-10· cited 371×
- Ernest Lee Vaden v. K. Summerhill R.L. Gower St. Andre Chapman W.A. DuncanNinth Circuit· 2006-06-06· cited 207×
- Joseph Barnes v. Kenneth R. Briley, Warden, Michael Krolikiewicz, Georgia SchonaurSeventh Circuit· 2005-08-23· cited 113×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.