Eleventh Circuit· 1/26/1995

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

Citations

43 F.3d 587
1995 WL 8998

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that arguments not fairly presented to the district court generally will not be considered on appeal
holding that an agreement to loan “additional monies” related to “regular banking transactions”
holding that the onus is upon the parties to formulate arguments and “[t]here is no burden upon the district court to distill every potential argument that could be made based upon the materials before it”
holding that “mere general allegations which do not reveal detailed and precise facts will not prevent the award of summary judgment,” and “a party may not rely on his pleadings to avoid [summary] judgment against him”
holding that a district court is not required to distill all potential legal arguments from the materials before it and the onus is on the parties to formulate legal arguments and present them to the district court for consideration
explaining that “grounds alleged in the complaint but not relied upon in summary judgment are deemed abandoned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

236 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.